日本の温室効果ガス削減の中期目標6案とりまとめ＝検討委2009年04月14日 19:51（日本時間／ロイター）
4月14日、政府の地球温暖化に関する懇談会の中期目標検討委員会は、6つの選択肢に関する経済への影響を取りまとめた。写真は京浜工業地帯。昨年11月撮影（2009年 ロイター／Toru Hanai
Posted byagf presson2009/04/16
［東京 14日 ロイター］
［with english version］
政府の地球温暖化に関する懇談会の中期目標検討委員会（座長：福井俊彦前日銀総裁）は14日、日本の温室効果ガス削減の中期目標の6つの選択肢に関する経済への影響を取りまとめて提示した。6 Medium-term goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions of Japan = Study committee
Government's committee to set medium-term goals on global warming (Chair: Toshihiko Fukui ex-Governor of the Bank of Japan) presented summary of economic effects about 6 medium-term goals for reducing greenhouse gases in Japan on 14th.
今週中にも懇談会に同6案を報告する。週明け20日から、全国5カ所で国民との意見交換を実施する。政府は、4月中旬から5月中旬までにパブリックコメントで国民の意見を幅広く求めた上で、6月までに日本としての中期目標を正式決定する。
The six proposals will be reported again on the meeting during this week. Exchange of opinions with the people will be performed in 5 places from 20th, the first of the week. The Japanese government will make a formal decision of medium-term goals until June, after ask public opinions to the people from mid-April to mid-May.
The six proposals will be reported again on the meeting during this week. Exchange of opinions with the people will be performed in 5 places from 20th, the first of the week. The Japanese government will make a formal decision of medium-term goals until June, after ask public opinions to the people from mid-April to mid-May.
検討委がまとめた6つの選択肢は、1）現状の技術の延長線、2）米欧と同程度の費用を投入、3）規制を一部行って最先端技術を導入、4）先進国の全体の削減率を1990年比25％としてGDPあたりの対策費用を均等にする、5）対策強化・義務付け導入、6）先進国一律1990年比25％削減――の6案。
6 choices summarized by the committee are: 1) extension of the current technology, 2) introducing the cost to the same extent as the United States and Europe, 3) advanced technology with some of the regulations, 4) equal to cost measures per GDP as 25% compared to 1990 of overall rate reduction in developed countries, 5) introduction of strengthening measures and obligation, 6) uniform 25% reduction in the ratio of 1990 in developed countries.
6 choices summarized by the committee are: 1) extension of the current technology, 2) introducing the cost to the same extent as the United States and Europe, 3) advanced technology with some of the regulations, 4) equal to cost measures per GDP as 25% compared to 1990 of overall rate reduction in developed countries, 5) introduction of strengthening measures and obligation, 6) uniform 25% reduction in the ratio of 1990 in developed countries.
それぞれの選択肢の2020年時点の排出量の増減率の試算は1990年比で、1）4％増（05年比4％減）、2）1％増―5％減（同6―12％減）、3）7％減（同14％減）、4）8―17％減（同13―23％減）、5）15％減（同21―22％減）、6）25％減（同30％減）――とした。90年比7％減（05年比14％減）の3番目の選択肢の場合、国内総生産（GDP）を2020年までの累積で0.5―0.6％押し下げるとしている。
The estimate of the percentage change in emissions by 2020 of each choice in the ratio of 1990 is: 1) 4% increase (4% decrease compared to 2005), 2) 1% increase - 5% decrease (6-12% decrease), 3) 7% decrease (14% decrease), 4) 8-17% decrease (13-23% decrease), 5) 15% decrease (21-22% decrease), 6) 25% decrease (30% decrease). In the case of the third option, 7% decrease in the ratio of 1990 (14% decrease in the ratio of 2005), the gross domestic product (GDP) is trying to be 0.5-0.6 lower by accumulations until the year 2020.
© Thomson Reuters 2009 All rights reserved.
（対訳／agf press）
The estimate of the percentage change in emissions by 2020 of each choice in the ratio of 1990 is: 1) 4% increase (4% decrease compared to 2005), 2) 1% increase - 5% decrease (6-12% decrease), 3) 7% decrease (14% decrease), 4) 8-17% decrease (13-23% decrease), 5) 15% decrease (21-22% decrease), 6) 25% decrease (30% decrease). In the case of the third option, 7% decrease in the ratio of 1990 (14% decrease in the ratio of 2005), the gross domestic product (GDP) is trying to be 0.5-0.6 lower by accumulations until the year 2020.
© Thomson Reuters 2009 All rights reserved.
（対訳／agf press）
